
[ad_1]

QrevoPlus
In the spring I had with him Roborock Qrevo MaxV took a closer look at a vacuum and mopping robot from Roborock. The model in question comes with rotating mops, one of which is extendable, and was quite convincing in the practical test. Roborock has now further expanded the Qrevo portfolio: the entry-level model is the Qrevo S (649 euros), followed by the Qrevo Plus (699 euros) and that Qrevo Pro (799 euros). The Qrevo MaxV (999 euros) sits above it. and the recently introduced Qrevo Master (1099 euros), which leads the Qrevo series as the new flagship model. The individual models usually only differ in small details. With the Qrevo Master I was able to take a look at the new top model, as well as a model at the lower end of the portfolio, the Qrevo Plus.
From a purely visual perspective, the two models are very similar. The changes are to be found under the hood: The Qrevo Master differs from the Qrevo MaxV in that it has an increased suction power of 10,000 Pa. It also has the FlexiArm design not only for wiping, but also – as with the S series – for the side brush. In addition, the DuoRoller riser brush design from the S series is also adopted and the docking station cleans itself.

QrevoPlus
Compared to the Qrevo MaxV, the Qrevo Plus is only rinsed with hot water at 45 degrees Celsius. There is also no automatic dirt detection. There is also no extendable side brush for wiping; it is reserved for the master. This cannot be raised either. But one of the two mops can be extended to the side. Compared to the Qrevo Pro, there are only small compromises in the suction and cleaning station. The Qrevo Plus also relies on Reactive Tech to avoid obstacles. This is Roborock’s solution without a camera. The camera-based Reactive AI is used in the Qrevo MaxV and also in the Qrevo Master.
In any case, on paper it sounds like the differences are manageable and if you’re not very keen on making decisions, the Qrevo MaxV is still in the golden mean.
The Qrevo Master and the Qrevo Plus are both well made, as is typical for Roborock. At first you don’t notice any difference between the two devices, which are quite different in price. I also don’t want to say too many words about the setup and the app with its incredible number of setting options, so I’ll refer you to old test reports. For us on the team, it is one of the best robot vacuum apps on the market. Roborock is working on Matter compatibility for its robot vacuum cleaners. Nothing has been announced for the models from the test yet, but I hope that corresponding updates will be provided here sooner or later.
Suction: 10,000 Pa vs. 7,000 Pa – more suction power, especially on paper
With its 10,000 Pa, the Qrevo Master has increased suction power compared to the 7,000 Pa of the Qrevo Plus. This is less noticeable in everyday life, regardless of the surface, and both deliver with their suction results.
Only the Master model has the FlexiArm side brush. This actually gets into corners much better to sweep up dirt and suck it up. Ultimately, you have to know whether you can tolerate it (in exchange for savings) in the corners and how winding your floor plan ultimately is.

FlexiArm side brush from Qrevo Master
Anyone who has to deal with hair will also have a nicer experience with the DuoRoller brush. It also has a small knife on the sides that cuts through hair. In everyday life, there was actually hardly any hair wrapped around the brushes; it looked a little different with the Plus model, as more hair remained tangled.

On the underside there are two brushes on the Qrevo Master: the DuoRoller brushes
Mopping: Both models rely on the FlexiArm design for the mop
I like mopping with the two rotating mops more than the vibrating mop pad of the S series. This should be the wiping method of choice, especially for surfaces where you don’t see any streaks on the floor. This is not a problem with our tiles or parquet.
The Qrevo Master and the Qrevo Plus are equal here. Both have the Flexi-Arm design feature, which allows mopping with an extendable mop right up to the edge. A function that I no longer want to be without. The Qrevo Plus is the cheapest model in the Qrevo portfolio that offers this feature and which is why I would say that I would definitely prefer the Qrevo Plus to the Qrevo S. Everything else is more of a smaller (detailed) function for which you have to consider whether the benefit and the additional cost are balanced for you. The entire Qrevo range can also lift the mop when the robot vacuum cleaner moves over a carpet.

QrevoPlus
The Qrevo Plus mop is simply washed with warm water. If you also want hot water at 60 degrees Celsius, you can also use the other dock, i.e. the Qrevo Pro. The Master also has a self-cleaning function, but here too you often have to remove the bowl to clean it – so for me it didn’t have a decisive (everyday) advantage in comparison.
Reactive AI vs. Reactive Tech in obstacle avoidance
For navigation, both test models rely on LDS, which finds its place in a laser tower structure. Mapping takes place and is continually adjusted. We already know this and at Roborock it is at a really high level.

Laser tower Qrevo Master
The situation is different when it comes to obstacle detection. The models in the Qrevo series also rely on different approaches, including the Qrevo Master and the Qrevo Plus. While the Qrevo Plus comes with Reactive Tech, the Qrevo Master is equipped with Reactive AI.

Qrevo Master – Reactive AI
Reactive AI uses structuring light along with a cross laser and an RGB camera. The app also offers the option of using the camera as a mobile surveillance camera. If you would like to do without a camera in a device, you also have a choice.

Qrevo Plus – Reactive Tech
Reactive Tech only works with structured light to detect obstacles. In my test, Reactive AI copes better with flatter objects, such as items of clothing or cables that are on the floor, compared to Reactive Tech. The Qrevo Plus often broke off the mop on a cable. Sure, you can also work with virtual boundaries or obstacles. In the course of this, cable ducts were also installed, which eliminated the problem. But it showed that the Qrevo Master can handle obstacles better. However, the S series is still clearly ahead when it comes to obstacle detection. For me, this would be the only area that Roborock’s flagship series does not yet offer in the Qrevo series, which is now populated with expensive models.
Bottom line?
With the Qrevo Plus, Roborock has a vacuum and mopping robot on offer for 699 euros that can score points in many areas and is right up there with its big brothers. The suction and wiping performance are impeccable and compromises tend to be made when it comes to details of the technical equipment such as the extendable FlexiArm brush. The Qrevo series is now quite chaotic due to its variety of models, but the small gradations also offer a more flexible choice of models. The Qrevo Plus makes the right compromises for me and in most households it should provide a more than satisfactory service. In other words: That should be enough for most people. Whether the “more” features make up for the 400 euro difference to the master model – well, I don’t know. With the Master, apart from obstacle detection, Roborock offers virtually everything your heart desires and what is also available in the flagship series. If you pay more, you get more – whether you need it or not. In terms of price-performance, the Plus model is clearly ahead for me.

Qrevo Master
transparency: Affiliate links are included in this article. By clicking on it you will go directly to the provider. If you decide to make a purchase there, we will receive a small commission. Nothing changes in price for you. Partner links have no influence on our reporting.
[ad_2]
Source link